Posts

Showing posts from 2017

Biological Approach (Treatments) - OCD

Biological Approach (Explanations) - OCD

Cognitive Approach (Treatments) - Depression

Cognitive Approach (Explanations) - Depression

Behavioural Approach (Treatments) - Phobias

Behavioural Approach (Explanations) - Phobias

Definitions of Abnormality - Deviation from Ideal Mental Health

Definitions of Abnormality - Failure to Function Adequately

Definitions of Abnormality - Deviation from Social Norms

Definitions of Abnormality - Statistical Infrequency

The Influence of Early Attachment

Effects of Institutionalisation - Romanian Orphan Studies

Maternal Deprivation - Bowlby

Cultural Variations in Attachment

Strange Situation - Ainsworth (Types of Attachment)

Explanations - Bowlby's Theory (Monotropic Theory)

Explanations - Learning Theory

Animal Studies of Attachment

The Development of Attachment

Caregiver-infant Interactions

The Cognitive Interview

EWT - Anxiety

EWT - Misleading Information

Explanations for Forgetting: Retrieval Failure

Explanations for Forgetting: Interference

The Working Model of Memory

Types of Long-term Memory

The Multi-Store Model of Memory

Coding, Capacity and Duration

The Fight or Flight Response

The Endocrine System

Neurons and Synaptic Transmission

The Nervous System

The Humanistic Approach - Rogers and Maslow

The Psychodynamic Approach - Freud

The Biological Approach

The Cognitive Approach

Social Learning Theory - Bandura

The Behaviourist Approach - Skinner (Operant Conditioning)

The Behaviourist Approach - Pavlov (Classical Conditioning)

Origins of Psychology

Social Change

Minority Influence - Moscovici

Resistance to Social Influence

Dispositional Explanations of Obedience - Authoritarian Personality

Explanations for Obedience - Legitimate Authority and Agentic State

Explanations for Obedience - Milgram (Situational Factors)

Conformity to Social Roles - Zimbardo

Majority Influence - Asch

Asch wanted to investigate whether people would conform to a majority even when the task was obvious 123 American undergrads participated in the study, being split into groups of 5-7, with only one person being the true participant and the rest being confederates that surrounded the participant who sat second to last within the group. They were asked to complete a "Vision test", where they were given a line and had to find another line that best fit. The task was unambiguous, but confederates were told to give a unanimous incorrect response to influence the participant to conform. Results displayed that 37% of trials showed a conforming response. 75% of participants showed to conform at least once, while 25% did not conform at all. This concluded that a majority can influence a minority, even in an unambiguous situation. Asch had showed that majority influence was much stronger than what had been previously thought.   One limitation of his study was the use of a biased sa...

Explanations of Conformity

Types of Conformity

The Sign Test

Distribution Curves

Tables and Graphs

Descriptive Statitistics

Types of Data

Psychology and the Economy

Peer Review

Ethics

Pilot Studies

Correlation

Observational Methods

Self-report Methods

Sampling

Variables

Aims and Hypotheses

Experimental Design

Experimental Method